Cloud accounts payable, accounts receivable and card-based spend software sold per user on published plans, with a fee schedule for each payment type. Aimed at small and midsize businesses and the accounting firms that run bill pay for them, syncing to QuickBooks, Xero and, on the Enterprise plan, mid-market ERPs.
| Edition | Stated size fit | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Essentials | 1–50 employees | $49 per user per month. AP or AR, standard approval policies, six standard user roles, accounting integration by CSV import and export only. The vendor prices by user, not by employee count; the employee band is Stackmark's approximation.[3] |
| Team | 5–200 employees | $65 per user per month. Adds automatic two-way sync with QuickBooks Online, Pro, Premier and Xero, custom approval policies and custom user roles. Employee band is Stackmark's approximation of a per-user plan.[3] |
| Corporate | 20–500 employees | $89 per user per month. AP, AR and Procurement together, discounted approver-only users, unlimited purchase requesters. Employee band is Stackmark's approximation of a per-user plan.[3] |
| Enterprise | 100–5,000 employees | Custom pricing. Adds two-way sync with QuickBooks Enterprise, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct and Microsoft Dynamics, purchase-order sync with two- and three-way matching, single sign-on, dual control, multi-entity accounting, API access and priority support. Employee band is Stackmark's approximation.[3] |
How deeply each module is covered, as recorded against the sources below. Core and moderate are native; partner means a certified add-on carries it; none is a recorded absence.
Industries the vendor names in its own positioning. Absence from this list is not a statement that the system is unsuitable, only that the vendor does not lead with it.
Consider BILL when a small or midsize business on QuickBooks or Xero wants AP and AR automation at a published per-user price and can accept per-payment fees.[3]
Consider BILL when an accounting firm wants to run bill pay for many client entities from one console, priced by client entity rather than by firm staff.[3]
Systems with a comparable size fit and cost band, which is why they appear on the same shortlists. Each link opens a head-to-head built from both records. They are the pairings a buyer is likely to shortlist, not a limit on what can be compared: any two systems in the dataset can be laid side by side, including combinations we never pair.
One note per module the system offers: the recorded depth, what to ask in a demonstration, and which other tracked systems carry the module natively.
Every fact in this profile was taken from the pages below, on the date shown. Footnote markers on the page point here. The positioning statement is Stackmark’s own.