The former Great Plains accounting system, still running in many small and mid-size North American businesses. Microsoft points its users at Business Central as the successor.
| Edition | Stated size fit | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Starter Pack | 10–500 employees | Financials (general ledger, payables, receivables, bank reconciliation, multicurrency, intercompany, fixed assets, analytical accounting), sales and purchase order processing, inventory, project accounting, HR and payroll, and reporting. The source gives no size band per pack; the band shown is the product's overall fit.[1] |
| Extended Pack | 10–500 employees | Adds manufacturing (bill of materials, order processing, quality assurance) and CRM-type functions such as contract administration, service calls, depot management and preventive maintenance. The source gives no size band per pack.[1] |
How deeply each module is covered, as recorded against the sources below. Core and moderate are native; partner means a certified add-on carries it; none is a recorded absence.
Industries the vendor names in its own positioning. Absence from this list is not a statement that the system is unsuitable, only that the vendor does not lead with it.
Consider Microsoft Dynamics GP only if you already run it and need to plan the remaining support window; new deployments are directed to Dynamics 365 Business Central.[2]
Consider keeping Dynamics GP through 2029 when the current installation meets your needs and you want time to plan a migration rather than move immediately.[1]
Systems with a comparable size fit and cost band, which is why they appear on the same shortlists. Each link opens a head-to-head built from both records. They are the pairings a buyer is likely to shortlist, not a limit on what can be compared: any two systems in the dataset can be laid side by side, including combinations we never pair.
One note per module the system offers: the recorded depth, what to ask in a demonstration, and which other tracked systems carry the module natively.
Every fact in this profile was taken from the pages below, on the date shown. Footnote markers on the page point here. The positioning statement is Stackmark’s own.