Corporate card, expense, travel and accounts payable software with a free tier and a published per-user Plus plan, funded partly by card interchange rather than transaction fees. Aimed at startups through multi-entity companies on QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite, Sage Intacct and, on Enterprise, Workday or Oracle Fusion Cloud.
| Edition | Stated size fit | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 1–50 employees | $0 per user per month. Unlimited cards, travel and expense, AP with OCR capture, approval workflows and payment by ACH, card, check and wire, QuickBooks Online and Xero integrations. The vendor says it is for smaller teams; the employee band is Stackmark's approximation.[2] |
| Plus | 10–1,000 employees | $15 per user per month plus a platform fee based on team size, 20% off with annual billing. Adds NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Acumatica and Dynamics 365 Business Central integrations, multi-entity support, custom roles, audit log and global coverage. Employee band is Stackmark's approximation.[2] |
| Enterprise | 200–100,000 employees | Custom pricing, annual billing. Adds Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud and Dynamics F&O integrations, local-currency card issuing in 30-plus countries, locally funded reimbursements, dedicated success manager and implementation services. Employee band is Stackmark's approximation.[2] |
How deeply each module is covered, as recorded against the sources below. Core and moderate are native; partner means a certified add-on carries it; none is a recorded absence.
Industries the vendor names in its own positioning. Absence from this list is not a statement that the system is unsuitable, only that the vendor does not lead with it.
Systems with a comparable size fit and cost band, which is why they appear on the same shortlists. Each link opens a head-to-head built from both records. They are the pairings a buyer is likely to shortlist, not a limit on what can be compared: any two systems in the dataset can be laid side by side, including combinations we never pair.
One note per module the system offers: the recorded depth, what to ask in a demonstration, and which other tracked systems carry the module natively.
Every fact in this profile was taken from the pages below, on the date shown. Footnote markers on the page point here. The positioning statement is Stackmark’s own.