The former Accpac product, aimed at smaller multi-entity and multi-currency businesses that need more than entry-level accounting but not a full ERP programme.
| Edition | Stated size fit | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | 1–25 employees | Source gives capacity limits, not employees: up to 5 users, 5 companies, 3 GL account segments and 7 years of GL history. Employee band is an approximation for a 5-user finance team.[1] |
| Advanced | 10–75 employees | Source gives capacity limits, not employees: up to 10 users, unlimited companies, 4 GL account segments. Employee band is an approximation for a 10-user team.[1] |
| Premium | 25–1,000 employees | Unlimited users and companies, 10 GL account segments, 99 years of GL history, plus inventory and order-entry pricing features the lower editions lack. The Sage 300cloud subscription is offered only in this edition. Employee band approximated from the source's 51–1,000 employee fit.[1] |
How deeply each module is covered, as recorded against the sources below. Core and moderate are native; partner means a certified add-on carries it; none is a recorded absence.
Industries the vendor names in its own positioning. Absence from this list is not a statement that the system is unsuitable, only that the vendor does not lead with it.
Consider Sage 300 when you run several companies, currencies or locations and need consolidated reporting from one system, but do not require a cloud-native architecture.[1]
Consider Sage 300 when you are a wholesale or import/export distributor that wants inventory, order entry and purchasing with a perpetual licence option.[1]
Consider Sage 300 over Sage 100 when multi-company, multi-currency or multi-location handling is the deciding requirement.[1]
Systems with a comparable size fit and cost band, which is why they appear on the same shortlists. Each link opens a head-to-head built from both records. They are the pairings a buyer is likely to shortlist, not a limit on what can be compared: any two systems in the dataset can be laid side by side, including combinations we never pair.
One note per module the system offers: the recorded depth, what to ask in a demonstration, and which other tracked systems carry the module natively.
Every fact in this profile was taken from the pages below, on the date shown. Footnote markers on the page point here. The positioning statement is Stackmark’s own.