SystemsHead-to-head

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs SAP Business ByDesign

Both state a fit for companies in a similar size range and sit in comparable cost bands, which is why they turn up on the same shortlist. Everything below is drawn from the two vendor records, each of which cites its sources. Any other pairing can be built in the comparison tool, including ones we do not generate a page for.

7 sources cited12 modules in commonReviewed September 2026

Build requirements for the demo

01Fact sheet

CriterionMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business ByDesign
Company size fit10–500 employees20–1,000 employees
Cost bandMid-marketMid-market
DeploymentOn-premiseCloud
Regions servedNorth AmericaAPAC, EMEA, North America
CategoriesAccounting, ERPAccounting, ERP
Industries namedNonprofit, Professional services, WholesaleManufacturing, Professional services, Wholesale
HeadquartersRedmond, Washington, United StatesWalldorf, Germany

Rows in ink differ between the systems; rows in grey are shared.

02Positioning

How Stackmark characterises each system, in its own words, from the sourced record.

Microsoft Dynamics GP

The former Great Plains accounting system, still running in many small and mid-size North American businesses. Microsoft points its users at Business Central as the successor.

SAP Business ByDesign

SAP’s older two-tier cloud suite for subsidiaries and smaller companies. SAP has stopped selling it to new customers, so the live question for existing users is where to migrate.

03Module coverage

Every module either system documents, side by side. A module both list is a shared claim, not a statement that the two implementations are equivalent.

ModuleMicrosoft Dynamics GPSAP Business ByDesign
Asset managementModerateModerate
Business intelligenceModerateModerate
CRMModerateCore
EcommerceNot offeredModerate
Field serviceNot checkedVia partner
Financial managementCoreCore
HR and payrollCoreModerate
Inventory managementModerateModerate
Manufacturing managementModerateModerate
ProcurementModerateCore
Project managementModerateCore
Quality managementModerateModerate
Supply chain managementModerateCore
Warehouse managementModerateModerate

Core Moderate Via partner Not offered Not checked

Compare with a different system

This page is one pairing. Stackmark generates a page for the pairings a buyer is likely to shortlist, which is a starting point and not a limit: any two systems can be laid side by side, including combinations we never pair.

Or open both in the comparison tool, and add up to 4

04Sources

Microsoft Dynamics GP3

  1. [1]Great Plains ERP (Dynamics GP) Guide 2026 | ERP Researchhttps://www.erpresearch.com/en-us/microsoft-dynamics-great-plains · retrieved 2026-09-07
  2. [2]Welcome to Dynamics GP - Dynamics GP | Microsoft Learnhttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics-gp/ · retrieved 2026-09-07
  3. [3]Dynamics GP 2018 - Microsoft Lifecycle | Microsoft Learnhttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/dynamics-gp-2018 · retrieved 2026-09-07

SAP Business ByDesign4

  1. [1]SAP Business ByDesign: Delisting & Migration | ERP Researchhttps://www.erpresearch.com/en-us/sap-business-bydesign-overview · retrieved 2026-09-07
  2. [2]SAP Business ByDesign | Overviewhttps://www.sap.com/products/erp/business-bydesign.html · retrieved 2026-09-07
  3. [3]SAP Help Portal | SAP Online Helphttps://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_BUSINESS_BYDESIGN · retrieved 2026-09-07
  4. [4]SAP Business ByDesign | Featureshttps://www.sap.com/products/erp/business-bydesign/features.html · retrieved 2026-09-07