Stackmark

SystemsVendor profile

DualEntry

An accounting suite marketed as the AI ERP: general ledger, payables, receivables, cash, purchase orders, close management, revenue recognition, fixed assets and financial planning, built for multi-entity, multi-book and multi-currency groups. It is aimed at finance teams moving off NetSuite, Sage Intacct, SAP, Dynamics or QuickBooks, and sells on a migration measured in days with implementation inside the licence.

41 facts on record3 sourcesverified September 20265 modules

Compare with Aptean ERP

01Profile

Categories
ERP, Accounting, Financial close, FP&Averified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction
Company size fit
20–5,000 employeesverified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction
Cost band
Mid-marketverified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction
Deployment
Cloudverified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction
Headquarters
New York, New York, United Statesverified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction
Regions served
North Americaverified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction
Website
dualentry.comverified 2026-09-10Suggest a correction

02Pricing and editions

Pricing model
Quote onlyverified 2026-09-10
Published list price
None published. Stackmark records a cost band, not a modelled figure.

03Functional depth

How deeply each module is covered, as recorded against the sources below. Core and moderate are native; partner means a certified add-on carries it; none is a recorded absence.

Coverage Map · ERP and finance systems · 2026-Q3COVERAGE MAP · ERP AND FINANCE SYSTEMS · 2026-Q3AI featuresAsset managementBusiness intelligenceCRMEcommerceField serviceFinancial managementHR and payrollInventory managementLocalizationsManufacturing managementProcurementProject managementQuality managementSupply chain managementWarehouse managementDualEntry 1DualEntry · AI features: Core. Core: native, documented as a primary module. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Asset management: Moderate. Moderate: native, documented as secondary or lighter scope. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Business intelligence: Core. Core: native, documented as a primary module. Footnote 1.DualEntry · CRM: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Ecommerce: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Field service: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Financial management: Core. Core: native, documented as a primary module. Footnote 1.DualEntry · HR and payroll: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Inventory management: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Localizations: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Manufacturing management: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Procurement: Moderate. Moderate: native, documented as secondary or lighter scope. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Project management: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Quality management: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Supply chain management: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.DualEntry · Warehouse management: Unverified. Unverified: not yet checked against a source. Footnote 1.CoreModeratePartnerNoneUnverifiedRows alphabetical · no totals · reuse with attribution, uncropped

Coverage Map · ERP and finance systems · 2026-Q3

  1. 1DualEntry: depth stated from 3 sources, verified 2026-09-10; unverified: CRM, Ecommerce, Field service, HR and payroll, Inventory management, Localizations, Manufacturing management, Project management, Quality management, Supply chain management, Warehouse management

Unverified: CRM, Ecommerce, Field service, HR and payroll, Inventory management, Localizations, Manufacturing management, Project management, Quality management, Supply chain management, Warehouse management. Not checked yet; not a statement either way.

04Vertical focus

Industries the vendor names in its own positioning. Absence from this list is not a statement that the system is unsuitable, only that the vendor does not lead with it.

  • Financial services
  • Software

Evaluated for

  • Subscription and SaaSRecurring-revenue businesses that need contract-based billing, deferred revenue recognition and SaaS metrics from the same ledger.
  • Multi-entity consolidationA group of legal entities, often in several currencies, that needs intercompany eliminations and a consolidated close from one ledger.

05Strengths and watch-outs

Strengths

  • Every plan carries unlimited users, transactions, classifications and currencies, with entity counts as the axis instead (up to 3, up to 20, then unlimited), and multi-currency consolidation from the middle plan up.[2]
  • "Implementation is included in all plans. We don't believe in charging by the hour and making money through implementation", against a stated timeline of data ingested in 24 hours and live in 4 to 6 weeks.[2]
  • A $90 million Series A led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and Khosla Ventures with GV, Contrary and Vesey Ventures, taking total funding past $100 million, on a platform it says has processed $100 billion of journal entries for customers from $5 million in revenue to NYSE-listed businesses.[3]
  • 13,000+ native integrations, with J.P. Morgan, Citi, HSBC, Revolut, Stripe, BILL, Salesforce, HubSpot, Snowflake, Gusto, Looker and Power BI named on the home page.[1]
  • SOC 1 and SOC 2 are listed on the plan comparison, alongside audit trails, approval workflows, custom user roles, SSO on the lower plans and SAML on the top one.[2]
  • Named customer outcomes: Graphite cut its close from 20 days to 1, Signal Ventures runs 20+ entities with one accountant, Streamside Parks consolidated 36 instances into one ERP across 50+ entities, and Trillion Digital closes daily on $5B+ of annual trading volume.[1]

Watch-outs

  • No price appears anywhere on the pricing page. Three plans are described, every call to action is "Schedule demo", and the pricing FAQ states there is no free trial.[2]
  • "Unlimited users" heads every plan, while the same page's FAQ says more users can be added "for an additional fee per user per month", so the seat count is unlimited and the seat cost is not.[2]
  • Several rows on the plan comparison are marked "Soon" rather than shipped (Multi-Book, Flux Reporting and multi-book amortization), and fixed assets on the entry plan is straight-line depreciation with disposals only.[2]
  • One customer is given three sizes across the vendor's own pages: the quote on the pricing page calls Slash a "$140-million revenue business", the home page presents it as a "$300M ARR" fintech, and the funding announcement as "a $100 million+ ARR modern banking platform".[2]
  • The go-live claim does not settle: the home page states "Data ingested in 24 hours" and "Live in 4-6 weeks", while the founder in the funding announcement says the product gets "businesses of any size and complexity live in 24 hours".[3]
  • Nothing on the retrieved pages addresses statutory e-invoicing or country localizations (no Peppol, ZATCA or UAE mandate), and the material is US-centric, so a Gulf or European filing obligation is not answered by anything published.[2]

06Consider when

  • Consider DualEntry when a US group wants multi-entity, multi-book accounting with implementation inside the licence and a migration measured in days rather than quarters, and operations run in other systems.[2]

  • Consider it with care outside North America: the published material names no country localization and no e-invoicing mandate, which is the first question a Gulf or EU entity has to answer.[2]

07Evaluated alongside

Systems with a comparable size fit and cost band, which is why they appear on the same shortlists. Each link opens a head-to-head built from both records. They are the pairings a buyer is likely to shortlist, not a limit on what can be compared: any two systems in the dataset can be laid side by side, including combinations we never pair.

Those are the systems commonly evaluated alongside DualEntry, not a limit on what can be compared. Choose any system to compare with DualEntry.

08Module notes

One note per module the system offers: the recorded depth, what to ask in a demonstration, and which other tracked systems carry the module natively.

09Questions buyers ask

How is DualEntry priced?
No prices are published. The pricing page describes three plans separated by entity count (up to 3, up to 20, unlimited), and every route to a figure is a demo booking. There is no free trial.[2]
Does implementation cost extra?
The pricing FAQ says no: "Implementation is included in all plans." It contrasts that with NetSuite, which it says "typically bills implementation as a separate $75K–$250K project".[2]
How many entities does it handle?
Up to 3 on the entry plan, up to 20 on the middle plan and unlimited on the top plan, with multi-currency consolidation from the middle plan up and multi-book marked "Soon".[2]
How established is DualEntry?
It launched from stealth in New York on 2 October 2025 with a $90 million Series A led by Lightspeed and Khosla Ventures, "just 18 months after launch", bringing total funding past $100 million. Founders are Santiago Nestares, co-founder and CEO, and Benedict Dohmen.[3]
Which systems do its customers come from?
It says it has migrated customers from NetSuite, Sage Intacct, SAP and Microsoft Dynamics, from systems being sunset such as Microsoft Great Plains, PeopleSoft and QuickBooks Desktop, and from starter systems including QuickBooks and Xero.[3]
What does it connect to?
It claims 13,000+ native integrations, naming J.P. Morgan, Citi, HSBC, Revolut, Stripe, BILL, Salesforce, HubSpot, Snowflake, Gusto, Looker and Power BI, plus an open API limited to 200 requests a minute on the lower plans.[1]
Does it handle UAE or Saudi e-invoicing?
Nothing on the retrieved pages mentions e-invoicing, Peppol, ZATCA or the UAE mandate. A Gulf buyer would have to establish that separately with the vendor.[2]

10Sources

Every fact in this profile was taken from the pages below, on the date shown. Footnote markers on the page point here. The positioning statement is Stackmark’s own.

  1. [1]AI ERP Software | DualEntryhttps://www.dualentry.com/ · retrieved 2026-09-10
  2. [2]Plans and Pricing | DualEntryhttps://www.dualentry.com/pricing · retrieved 2026-09-10
  3. [3]DualEntry Raises $90M Series A to Redefine ERP as AI-Native | DualEntryhttps://www.dualentry.com/funding-announcement · retrieved 2026-09-10